linux-kernel - Re: [Patch v4 00/12] memory-hotplug: hot-remove physical memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:27:41 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	x86@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, cmetcalf@...era.com,
	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
	benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
	Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v4 00/12] memory-hotplug: hot-remove physical memory

On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 18:00:10 +0800
Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com> wrote:

> The patch-set was divided from following thread's patch-set.
>     https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/5/201
> 
> The last version of this patchset:
>     https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/1/93

As we're now at -rc7 I'd prefer to take a look at all of this after the
3.7 release - please resend everything shortly after 3.8-rc1.

> If you want to know the reason, please read following thread.
> 
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/2/83

Please include the rationale within each version of the patchset rather
than by linking to an old email.  Because

a) this way, more people are likely to read it

b) it permits the text to be maimtained as the code evolves

c) it permits the text to be included in the mainlnie commit, where
   people can find it.

> The patch-set has only the function of kernel core side for physical
> memory hot remove. So if you use the patch, please apply following
> patches.
> 
> - bug fix for memory hot remove
>   https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/31/269
>   
> - acpi framework
>   https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/26/175

What's happening with the acpi framework?  has it received any feedback
from the ACPI developers?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/