[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1211272118400.3933@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 21:19:44 +0100 (CET)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>
Cc: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...il.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Stephane Chatty <chatty@...c.fr>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] HID: hid-input: simplify hid_input allocation and
registration
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
> > In order to provide fine control for the creation of different
> > input devices in probe function of third party drivers, this patch
> > split the allocations, the registrations and the free of input
> > devices.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...il.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/hid/hid-input.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> I don't like this patch, nor its purpose. Drivers should not depend on
> the hid core working in a particular way internally, that spells
> disaster. There must be some other way in which the same effect can be
> achieved?
The changelog doesn't seem to be really verbose enough to me.
What exactly is the scenario you are looking at here, Benjamin, please?
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists