[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50B52DC4.5000109@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 16:16:52 -0500
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>,
Johannes Hirte <johannes.hirte@....tu-ilmenau.de>,
Tomas Racek <tracek@...hat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>,
Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@...mhuis.info>,
Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@...hat.com>,
Bruno Wolff III <bruno@...ff.to>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kswapd craziness in 3.7
On 11/27/2012 03:58 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Note that in the meantime, I've also applied (through Andrew) the
> patch that reverts commit c654345924f7 (see commit 82b212f40059
> 'Revert "mm: remove __GFP_NO_KSWAPD"').
>
> I wonder if that revert may be bogus, and a result of this same issue.
> Maybe that revert should be reverted, and replaced with your patch?
>
> Mel? Zdenek? What's the status here?
Mel posted several patches to fix the kswapd issue. This one is
slightly more risky than the outright revert, but probably preferred
from a performance point of view:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/12/151
It works by skipping the kswapd wakeup for THP allocations, only
if compaction is deferred or contended.
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists