[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121128141230.GI928@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 16:12:30 +0200
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: x86: improve reexecute_instruction
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:30:24AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> On 11/27/2012 06:41 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> >>
> >> - return false;
> >> +again:
> >> + page_fault_count = ACCESS_ONCE(vcpu->kvm->arch.page_fault_count);
> >> +
> >> + /*
> >> + * if emulation was due to access to shadowed page table
> >> + * and it failed try to unshadow page and re-enter the
> >> + * guest to let CPU execute the instruction.
> >> + */
> >> + kvm_mmu_unprotect_page(vcpu->kvm, gpa_to_gfn(gpa));
> >> + emulate = vcpu->arch.mmu.page_fault(vcpu, cr3, PFERR_WRITE_MASK, false);
> >
> > Can you explain what is the objective here?
> >
>
> Sure. :)
>
> The instruction emulation is caused by fault access on cr3. After unprotect
> the target page, we call vcpu->arch.mmu.page_fault to fix the mapping of cr3.
> if it return 1, mmu can not fix the mapping, we should report the error,
> otherwise it is good to return to guest and let it re-execute the instruction
> again.
>
> page_fault_count is used to avoid the race on other vcpus, since after we
> unprotect the target page, other cpu can enter page fault path and let the
> page be write-protected again.
>
> This way can help us to detect all the case that mmu can not be fixed.
>
Can you write this in a comment above vcpu->arch.mmu.page_fault()?
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists