[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87pq2x4xkm.fsf@octavius.laptop.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 09:22:01 -0500
From: Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>
To: merez@...eaurora.org
Cc: linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
"open list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mmc: core: Add support for idle time BKOPS
Hi Maya,
On Sun, Nov 25 2012, merez@...eaurora.org wrote:
> I managed to find a solution in which there is no need to check the number
> of written / discarded sectors as a trigger for BKOPS status check.
> I moved the code that checks the need to stop the BKOPS to mmc/block code,
> in which there is no need for additional claim_host and remove_host
> operations.
> Please review this patch.
Looks good -- if we find that counting with a bitmask of eraseblocks is
necessary it can be added on later.
Do you have a testing plan for the patch? I wonder if we could test
the effects on battery life and latency.
Thanks!
- Chris.
--
Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org> <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists