linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] mfd: stmpe: Get rid of irq_invert

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKohpok=VyQhmfNe_qzM5PKpw6BjH4LyKVoau-ppBy9xdNHejg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 29 Nov 2012 00:09:24 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	sameo@...ux.intel.com, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
	rabin.vincent@...ricsson.com, shiraz.hashim@...com
Cc:	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	spear-devel@...t.st.com, lee.jones@...aro.org,
	linus.walleij@...aro.org, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] mfd: stmpe: Get rid of irq_invert_polarity

On 29 November 2012 00:05, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> Since the very first patch, stmpe core driver is using irq_invert_polarity as
> part of platform data. But, nobody is actually using it in kernel till now.
>
> Also, this is not something part of hardware specs, but is included to cater
> some board mistakes or quirks.
>
> So, better get rid of it. This is earlier discussed here:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/27/636
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>

Please ignore this series.. Two issues:
- rebased over an un accepted patch which rearranges header file
- I can improve patch 2/3 a bit.

I will resend it shortlly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/