[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50B65D6D.1000303@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 19:52:29 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
CC: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@...sung.com>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
'Kyungmin Park' <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
'Felipe Balbi' <balbi@...com>,
'Greg Kroah-Hartman' <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
'Joel Becker' <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] fs: configfs: programmatically create config groups
On 11/28/2012 03:24 PM, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28 2012, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>> <function_name>-<common_name>
>> /functions/acm-function/
>>
>> instead of
>> <common_name>
>> /functions/function1/
>> +name
>> with attribute file named "name" which contains the name of the
>> function (i.e. acm). My point is to keep "name" in the directory name
>> instead having an extra attribute.
>
> Right. But as I've suggested:
>
> mkdir functions/<function-name>
> mkdir functions/<function-name>/<common-name>
>
> which IMO is easier to handle in kernel (no parsing) and looks nicer in
> user space.
Just posted an example. Please tell me what you think.
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists