[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121128162001.3f326720@thirdoffive.cmf.nrl.navy.mil>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 16:20:01 -0500
From: chas williams - CONTRACTOR <chas@....nrl.navy.mil>
To: Krzysztof Mazur <krzysiek@...lesie.net>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] pppoatm: protect against freeing of vcc
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 21:18:37 +0100
Krzysztof Mazur <krzysiek@...lesie.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 07:28:43PM +0100, Krzysztof Mazur wrote:
> > I think that we should add atm_pop() function that does that and fix all
> > drivers.
> >
>
> I'm sending a patch that implements that idea.
>
> Currently we need two arguments vcc and skb. However, we have reserved
> ATM_SKB(skb)->vcc in skb control block for keeping vcc
> and we can create single argument version vcc_pop(skb). In that case
> we need to move:
>
> ATM_SKB(skb)->vcc = vcc;
>
> from ATM drivers to functions that call atmdev_ops->send().
i dont like the vcc->pop() implementation and at one point i had the
crazy idea of using skb->destructors to handle it. however, i think it
would be necessary to clone the skb's so any existing destructor is
preserved.
> +#define vcc_pop(vcc, skb) vcc_pop_any(vcc, skb)
> +#define vcc_pop_irq(vcc, skb) vcc_pop_any(vcc, skb)
don't define these if you dont plan on using them anway.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists