[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1354138460-19286-7-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 13:34:13 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: lizefan@...wei.com, paul@...lmenage.org, glommer@...allels.com
Cc: containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, mhocko@...e.cz, bsingharora@...il.com,
hannes@...xchg.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 06/13] cpuset: cleanup cpuset[_can]_attach()
cpuset_can_attach() prepare global variables cpus_attach and
cpuset_attach_nodemask_{to|from} which are used by cpuset_attach().
There is no reason to prepare in cpuset_can_attach(). The same
information can be accessed from cpuset_attach().
Move the prepartion logic from cpuset_can_attach() to cpuset_attach()
and make the global variables static ones inside cpuset_attach().
While at it, convert cpus_attach to cpumask_t from cpumask_var_t.
There's no reason to mess with dynamic allocation on a static buffer.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
---
kernel/cpuset.c | 34 +++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
index 5a52ed6..8bdd983 100644
--- a/kernel/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
@@ -1395,15 +1395,6 @@ static int fmeter_getrate(struct fmeter *fmp)
return val;
}
-/*
- * Protected by cgroup_lock. The nodemasks must be stored globally because
- * dynamically allocating them is not allowed in can_attach, and they must
- * persist until attach.
- */
-static cpumask_var_t cpus_attach;
-static nodemask_t cpuset_attach_nodemask_from;
-static nodemask_t cpuset_attach_nodemask_to;
-
/* Called by cgroups to determine if a cpuset is usable; cgroup_mutex held */
static int cpuset_can_attach(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cgroup_taskset *tset)
{
@@ -1430,19 +1421,15 @@ static int cpuset_can_attach(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cgroup_taskset *tset)
return ret;
}
- /* prepare for attach */
- if (cs == &top_cpuset)
- cpumask_copy(cpus_attach, cpu_possible_mask);
- else
- guarantee_online_cpus(cs, cpus_attach);
-
- guarantee_online_mems(cs, &cpuset_attach_nodemask_to);
-
return 0;
}
static void cpuset_attach(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cgroup_taskset *tset)
{
+ /* static bufs protected by cgroup_mutex */
+ static cpumask_t cpus_attach;
+ static nodemask_t cpuset_attach_nodemask_from;
+ static nodemask_t cpuset_attach_nodemask_to;
struct mm_struct *mm;
struct task_struct *task;
struct task_struct *leader = cgroup_taskset_first(tset);
@@ -1450,12 +1437,20 @@ static void cpuset_attach(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cgroup_taskset *tset)
struct cpuset *cs = cgroup_cs(cgrp);
struct cpuset *oldcs = cgroup_cs(oldcgrp);
+ /* prepare for attach */
+ if (cs == &top_cpuset)
+ cpumask_copy(&cpus_attach, cpu_possible_mask);
+ else
+ guarantee_online_cpus(cs, &cpus_attach);
+
+ guarantee_online_mems(cs, &cpuset_attach_nodemask_to);
+
cgroup_taskset_for_each(task, cgrp, tset) {
/*
* can_attach beforehand should guarantee that this doesn't
* fail. TODO: have a better way to handle failure here
*/
- WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(task, cpus_attach));
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(task, &cpus_attach));
cpuset_change_task_nodemask(task, &cpuset_attach_nodemask_to);
cpuset_update_task_spread_flag(cs, task);
@@ -1958,9 +1953,6 @@ int __init cpuset_init(void)
if (err < 0)
return err;
- if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&cpus_attach, GFP_KERNEL))
- BUG();
-
number_of_cpusets = 1;
return 0;
}
--
1.7.11.7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists