[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121128194254.GB27608@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 16:42:54 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, eranian@...gle.com, mingo@...nel.org,
namhyung@...nel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 31/32] perf, tools: Default to cpu// for events v3
Em Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 08:04:36PM +0100, Andi Kleen escreveu:
> > > +static void str_append(char **s, int *len, const char *a)
> > > +{
> > > + int olen = *s ? strlen(*s) : 0;
> > > + int nlen = olen + strlen(a) + 1;
> > > + if (*len < nlen) {
> > > + *len = *len * 2;
> > > + if (*len < nlen)
> > > + *len = nlen;
> > > + *s = realloc(*s, *len);
> > > + if (!*s)
> > > + exit(ENOMEM);
> >
> > Rather use BUG_ON or event better return -ENOMEM.
>
> Neither makes sense: the callers won't handle it and it's not a bug.
> If you're out of memory in user space the only thing you can do is to
> exit.
Nope, just propagate it back and handle at the callers, the memory
exhaustion may be temporary, just warn the user.
- Arnaldo
> >
> > > + if (olen == 0)
> > > + **s = 0;
> > > + }
> > > + strcat(*s, a);
> > > +}
> >
> > Could this one be moved to util/string.c in some generic form?
>
> Ok.
>
> -Andi
>
> --
> ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists