[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50B73B22.90500@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 19:38:26 +0900
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
CC: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"rob@...dley.net" <rob@...dley.net>,
"laijs@...fujitsu.com" <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
"wency@...fujitsu.com" <wency@...fujitsu.com>,
"linfeng@...fujitsu.com" <linfeng@...fujitsu.com>,
"yinghai@...nel.org" <yinghai@...nel.org>,
"kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
"minchan.kim@...il.com" <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
"mgorman@...e.de" <mgorman@...e.de>,
"rientjes@...gle.com" <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"rusty@...tcorp.com.au" <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"Wang, Frank" <frank.wang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Add movablecore_map boot option
Hi Tony,
2012/11/29 6:34, Luck, Tony wrote:
>> 1. use firmware information
>> According to ACPI spec 5.0, SRAT table has memory affinity structure
>> and the structure has Hot Pluggable Filed. See "5.2.16.2 Memory
>> Affinity Structure". If we use the information, we might be able to
>> specify movable memory by firmware. For example, if Hot Pluggable
>> Filed is enabled, Linux sets the memory as movable memory.
>>
>> 2. use boot option
>> This is our proposal. New boot option can specify memory range to use
>> as movable memory.
>
> Isn't this just moving the work to the user? To pick good values for the
Yes.
> movable areas, they need to know how the memory lines up across
> node boundaries ... because they need to make sure to allow some
> non-movable memory allocations on each node so that the kernel can
> take advantage of node locality.
There is no problem.
Linux has already two boot options, kernelcore= and movablecore=.
So if we use them, non-movable memory is divided into each node evenly.
But there is no way to specify a node used as movable currently. So
we proposed the new boot option.
> So the user would have to read at least the SRAT table, and perhaps
> more, to figure out what to provide as arguments.
>
> Since this is going to be used on a dynamic system where nodes might
> be added an removed - the right values for these arguments might
> change from one boot to the next. So even if the user gets them right
> on day 1, a month later when a new node has been added, or a broken
> node removed the values would be stale.
I don't think so. Even if we hot add/remove node, the memory range of
each memory device is not changed. So we don't need to change the boot
option.
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
>
> -Tony
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists