linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH, resend] kfifo: initialize fifo accordingly to C99 standard

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VcNiZiAJuDfCxjWo9TAz4ottS+30L6_d4UD59jpBsw9Vg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:05:33 +0200
From:	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, resend] kfifo: initialize fifo accordingly to C99 standard

On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:51 AM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 16:31:11 +0200
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>> When build a kernel with "make W=1" we will get a warning about missing
>> initializer. It comes from kfifo usage style. The DEFINE_KFIFO macro doesn't
>> initialize the buf[] field of the fifo structure. So, using C99 style helps in
>> such case.
>
> This doesn't actually work:
>
> drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_core.c:573: error: unknown field 'kfifo' specified in initializer
> drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_core.c:573: error: unknown field 'in' specified in initializer
> drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_core.c:573: warning: missing braces around initializer
> drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_core.c:573: warning: (near initialization for '(anonymous).<anonymous>.kfifo')
> drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_core.c:573: error: unknown field 'out' specified in initializer

It's strange. After I reverted the mentioned commit (about
Makefile.build) and applied my patch I got no warnings
  CC [M]  samples/kfifo/inttype-example.o
  CC [M]  samples/kfifo/record-example.o

> gcc-4.4.4.

gcc 4.7.2 might be the case.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/