[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121129160627.GB15399@ennui.austin.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 10:06:27 -0600
From: Kent Yoder <key@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Huewe <PeterHuewe@....de>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Rajiv Andrade <mail@...jiv.net>,
Marcel Selhorst <tpmdd@...horst.net>,
Sirrix AG <tpmdd@...rix.com>,
tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] char/tpm: Use true and false for bools
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 01:42:47AM +0100, Peter Huewe wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 29. November 2012, 01:25:19 schrieb Al Viro:
> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 01:20:37AM +0100, Peter Huewe wrote:
> > > - itpm = (probe == 0) ? 0 : 1;
> > > + itpm = (probe == 0) ? false : true;
> >
> > Charming. Not that original had been better, but...
> Yeah. Sorry it's late.
> The tpm subsection has a lot of nice suprises.
:-) I'd prefer
itpm = !!probe;
Now I don't have to go look up what the possible return values of
probe_itpm() are...
Kent
> I changed it to itpm = probe; which is equivalent here and sent out a v2.
> I'll probably rewrite that code section anytime soon.
>
> Thanks for noticing.
> Peter
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists