| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 09:51:36 +0800 From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org> To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...com> CC: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@...xeda.com>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org" <devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6 v6] cpufreq, highbank: add support for highbank cpufreq > The notifiers in the clk framework might be a better place for this than > just simply hacking the logic into the .set_rate callback. Ah, right. How did I forget about that nice piece? > I haven't looked at the definition of hb_voltage_change but does the > call graph make any clk api calls? Are you talking over i2c to a > regulator? If so then you'll probably hit the same reentrancy problem I > hit when trying to make a general solution. So, how is your "reentrancy in the common clk framework" series[1] going on? Haven't seen any update since August. Shawn [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/182198 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists