[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121129015133.GD28170@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 09:51:36 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...com>
CC: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@...xeda.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6 v6] cpufreq, highbank: add support for highbank
cpufreq
> The notifiers in the clk framework might be a better place for this than
> just simply hacking the logic into the .set_rate callback.
Ah, right. How did I forget about that nice piece?
> I haven't looked at the definition of hb_voltage_change but does the
> call graph make any clk api calls? Are you talking over i2c to a
> regulator? If so then you'll probably hit the same reentrancy problem I
> hit when trying to make a general solution.
So, how is your "reentrancy in the common clk framework" series[1]
going on? Haven't seen any update since August.
Shawn
[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/182198
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists