[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m2sj7sfbk8.fsf@firstfloor.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:34:15 -0800
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] sched, numa, mm: Add adaptive NUMA affinity support
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> writes:
> +
> + down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
> + for (vma = mm->mmap; vma; vma = vma->vm_next) {
> + if (!vma_migratable(vma))
> + continue;
> + change_protection(vma, vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end, vma_prot_none(vma), 0);
> + }
What happens if I have a 1TB process? Will you really unmap all of the
1TB in that timer?
>
> case MPOL_PREFERRED:
> if (pol->flags & MPOL_F_LOCAL)
> - polnid = numa_node_id();
> + best_nid = numa_node_id();
> else
> - polnid = pol->v.preferred_node;
> + best_nid = pol->v.preferred_node;
So that's not the local node anymore? That will change behaviour for
people using the NUMA affinity APIs explicitely. I don't think that's a
good idea, if someone set the affinity explicitely the kernel better
follow that.
If you want to change behaviour for non DEFAULT like this
please use a new policy type.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists