[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121129220811.GA32514@ennui.austin.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:08:11 -0600
From: Kent Yoder <key@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>, Rajiv Andrade <mail@...jiv.net>,
Marcel Selhorst <tpmdd@...horst.net>,
Sirrix AG <tpmdd@...rix.com>,
tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] char/tpm: Use true and false for bools
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 01:54:52PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 22:08 +0100, Peter Huewe wrote:
> > Bool initializations should use true and false. Bool tests don't need
> > comparisons
> []
> > .v3 for this tiny patch... shame on me.
>
> Don't be silly...
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
> []
> > @@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ static int tpm_tis_init(struct device *dev, resource_size_t start,
> > rc = -ENODEV;
> > goto out_err;
> > }
> > - itpm = (probe == 0) ? 0 : 1;
> > + itpm = !!probe;
>
> Even more trivia:
>
> This !! isn't necessary as ints assigned to bool are converted
> by the compiler to 0 or 1.
Good to know, thanks Joe!
Kent
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists