linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] Do a proper locking for mmap and block size change

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFzeq1HZvEZdmx=f8at2UOWcyp4oZv0RCX4dd0+dthuM1w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 29 Nov 2012 14:16:50 -0800
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...ionio.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Chris Mason <clmason@...ionio.com>,
	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@...il.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Do a proper locking for mmap and block size change

On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Chris Mason <chris.mason@...ionio.com> wrote:
>
> Just reading the new blkdev_get_blocks, it looks like we're mixing
> shifts.  In direct-io.c map_bh->b_size is how much we'd like to map, and
> it has no relation at all to the actual block size of the device.  The
> interface is abusing b_size to ask for as large a mapping as possible.

Ugh. That's a big violation of how buffer-heads are supposed to work:
the block number is very much defined to be in multiples of b_size
(see for example "submit_bh()" that turns it into a sector number).

But you're right. The direct-IO code really *is* violating that, and
knows that get_block() ends up being defined in i_blkbits regardless
of b_size.

What a crock. That direct-IO code is hack-upon-hack. Whoever wrote it
should be shot.

I think the only sane way to fix is is to pass in the block size to
get_blocks(). Which we admittedly should have done long ago, so that's
not a bad fix, but without actually looking at what it involves, I
think it's going to be pretty big patch. All the filesystems that
support the interface need to update it, even if they can then ignore
it, because direct-IO does all these hacks only for the raw device.

And I think it will improve the interface, but damn, direct-IO is
still horrible for playing these kinds of games.

                    Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/