[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121129142143.22886573.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 14:21:43 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>,
"Jan H." Schönherr <schnhrr@...tu-berlin.de>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 00/23] printk: refactoring
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 14:08:15 -0800
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 15:26 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 14:54:10 -0800
> > Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 06:49 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 20:43 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > > Make printk a bit more readable.
> > > >
> > > > Andrew? Are you going to apply this again for -next?
> > >
> > > Andrew? Any answer?
> >
> > Backlogged, not lost. Hopefully this week or next week.
> >
> > I trust it has had more thorough compilation coverage testing
> > than v1?
>
> Well, it's getting to be too late for this series.
Yeah sorry, stuff got in the way, then people patched printk.c.
> When would be the best time to resubmit and get this
> into -next?
I think at rc1. Then if all is OK I'd aim at a merge for rc2 or rc3
because these patches are rather a pain to keep alive.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists