[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50B846B2.9040700@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 11:10:02 +0530
From: Abhijit Pawar <abhi.c.pawar@...il.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
CC: Abhijit Pawar <abhi.c.pawar@...il.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] fs/super.c set_anon_super calling optimization
On 11/30/2012 09:35 AM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 11:14:41AM -0200, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 05:08:19PM +0530, Abhijit Pawar wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> set_anon_super is called by many filesystems. Some call directly and
>>> some call through the wrapper. Many of them in the wrapper's call to
>>> this function are passing the second argument to this function which
>>> is not used anywhere.
>>>
>>> This patch replaces the second variable with NULL.
>>>
>>
>> If the variable isn't used anymore, why don't just get rid of it, instead of
>> call the function passing a NULL pointer on it?
>
> Because we want it to be a valid sget() callback. I doubt that this
> optimization is worth doing, though - might even micro-pessimize the things
> on architectures where all arguments are passed in registers.
>
Al,
Yes. it will be helpful in registers case.
--
-
Abhijit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists