linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] i2c-s3c2410: Add bus arbitration implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOesGMgE0JEHsdySpua34_kbWi1+z4n4UdW0kumiJEROi7O2pQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 29 Nov 2012 22:14:58 -0800
From:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To:	Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>
Cc:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@...sung.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
	grundler@...omium.org, naveen@...omium.org, w.sang@...gutronix.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] i2c-s3c2410: Add bus arbitration implementation

On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org> wrote:
> +Olof
>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Mark Brown
> <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:35:35AM +0530, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote:
>>
>>> The arbitrator is a general purpose function which uses two GPIOs to
>>> communicate with another device to claim/release a bus. We use it to
>>> arbitrate an i2c port between the AP and the EC.
>>
>> Should this not be layerd on top of the I2C controller rather than part
>> of the controller driver?  It doesn't seem terribly controller specific.
>
> It was originally done separately but I think it was felt that this
> was overly complex. Olof can you please comment on this?

it is indeed not controller specific per se, but we are unaware of any
other platform/driver using it. So, it seemed reasonable to implement
it in the driver as long as we have only one user; if another one
comes along it's of course better to move it to the common i2c code.

At least that was my opinion at the time. I could be convinced
otherwise if someone else has strong opinions on the matter.


-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/