[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121130111614.GA1729@sortiz-mobl>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 12:16:14 +0100
From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
To: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: da9052-core: Fix interrupts reported to mfd child
devices
Hi Philipp,
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:04:38PM +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> Hi Philipp,
>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 04:04:28PM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > The patch "mfd: da9052-core: Use regmap_irq_get_virq() and fix the probe"
> > replaces the irq_base with the da9052_map_irq function but doesn't
> > update the irq_base parameter to the mfd_add_devices call.
> > This causes child devices to try and request IRQs with just the internal
> > offset number.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
> > ---
> > drivers/mfd/da9052-core.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> Applied,
I'll take that back. It fails to build because on my for-next branch
da9052_map_irq() is a da9052-irq.c static function. It was moved from core.c
to irq.c with Fabio's patch "mfd: da9052: Introduce da9052-irq.c", commit
8bad1abd6303476d6f77878aa8ea737d5d1b625c.
Cheers,
Samuel.
--
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists