linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/14] perf tool: Centralize default columns init in perf_hpp_

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121130115657.GB1080@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 30 Nov 2012 12:56:57 +0100
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/14] perf tool: Centralize default columns init in
 perf_hpp__init

On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 02:06:51PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
> 
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 13:13:19 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 08:55:47PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> >> On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:52:45 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >> > Now when diff command is separated from other standard outputs,
> >> > we can use perf_hpp__init to initialize all standard columns.
> >> >
> >> > Moving PERF_HPP__OVERHEAD column init back to perf_hpp__init,
> >> > and removing extra enable calls.
> >> 
> >> Why was this needed in the first place?  AFAIK it's already there and
> >> didn't used only for perf diff.
> >
> > hm, I think PERF_HPP__OVERHEAD wasn't part of perf_hpp__init and every
> > report except for diff command is using it.. so I think it makes sense
> > to move it to perf_hpp__init.. maybe I'm missing something.
> 
> You're right.  The _OVERHEAD column was enabled by default but wasn't
> part of the _init function - sorry for the confusion.  But what I try to
> say was that it can be folded into the patch 1.

hm, probably yes.. I'll check

thanks,
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/