[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1354278480.30168.116.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 14:28:00 +0200
From: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Philip, Avinash" <avinashphilip@...com>
Cc: dwmw2@...radead.org, afzal@...com, tony@...mide.com,
broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, nsekhar@...com, gururaja.hebbar@...com,
ivan.djelic@...rot.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mtd: nand: omap2: Support for hardware BCH error
correction
On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 12:38 +0530, Philip, Avinash wrote:
> +static int erased_sector_bitflips(u_char *data, u_char *oob,
> + struct omap_nand_info *info)
> +{
> + int flip_bits = 0, i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < info->nand.ecc.size; i++) {
> + flip_bits += hweight8(~data[i]);
> + if (flip_bits > info->nand.ecc.strength)
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < info->nand.ecc.bytes - 1; i++) {
> + flip_bits += hweight8(~oob[i]);
> + if (flip_bits > info->nand.ecc.strength)
> + return 0;
> + }
Why do you need the second for loop?
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists