[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121130014607.GD13478@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 17:46:07 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc: Peng Tao <tao.peng@....com>,
Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com,
Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton.krzesinski@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 041/270] pnfsblock: fix partial page buffer wirte
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 02:33:24AM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 14:55 -0200, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote:
> > 3.5.7u1 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > ------------------
> >
> > From: Peng Tao <bergwolf@...il.com>
> >
> > commit fe6e1e8d9fad86873eb74a26e80a8f91f9e870b5 upstream.
> >
> > If applications use flock to protect its write range, generic NFS
> > will not do read-modify-write cycle at page cache level. Therefore
> > LD should know how to handle non-sector aligned writes. Otherwise
> > there will be data corruption.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Tao <tao.peng@....com>
> > Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton.krzesinski@...onical.com>
> [...]
>
> I notice that this fix is missing from 3.4, and will need backporting.
I don't trust myself with backporting this, as I got it wrong. So if
one of the NFS developers wants to do this (same goes for the other NFS
patch), I'll gladly take it.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists