linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging/serqt_usb2: Refactor qt_status_change_check() in serqt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 30 Nov 2012 21:53:57 +0900
From:	YAMANE Toshiaki <yamanetoshi@...il.com>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging/serqt_usb2: Refactor qt_status_change_check() in serqt_usb2.c

On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 06:10:26PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 01:57:56PM +0900, YAMANE Toshiaki wrote:
>> >
>> > -                           ProcessLineStatus(qt_port, data[i + 3]);
>> > -
>> >                             i += 3;
>> > +                           ProcessLineStatus(qt_port, data[i]);
>>
>> I think you just changed the logic in this function, didn't you?
>
> This should be ok.  The i += 3 was there in the original, it's just
> moved up a line.

Thanks for your kindness reply.

But please discard this patch.
Let me consider this patch again.


Regards,

YAMANE Toshiaki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/