linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] pppoatm: protect against freeing of vcc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 30 Nov 2012 16:23:46 +0000
From:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To:	Krzysztof Mazur <krzysiek@...lesie.net>
Cc:	"Chas Williams (CONTRACTOR)" <chas@....nrl.navy.mil>,
	David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>, davem@...emloft.net,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	nathan@...verse.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] pppoatm: protect against freeing of vcc

On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 12:10 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> In that case I think we're fine. I'll just do the same thing in
> br2684_push(), fix up the comment you just corrected, and we're all
> good.

OK, here's an update to me my patch 8/17 'br2684: don't send frames on
not-ready vcc'. It takes the socket lock and does fairly much the same
thing as your pppoatm version. It returns NETDEV_TX_BUSY and stops the
queue if the socket is locked, and it gets woken from the ->release_cb
callback.

I've dropped your Acked-By: since it's mostly new, but feel free to give
me a fresh one. With this I think we're done.

Unless Chas has any objections, I'll ask Dave to pull it...


From 47d5ad4c98452bcddfd00da1c659dac85202f213 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 23:28:36 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] br2684: don't send frames on not-ready vcc

Avoid submitting packets to a vcc which is being closed. Things go badly
wrong when the ->pop method gets later called after everything's been
torn down.

Use the ATM socket lock for synchronisation with vcc_destroy_socket(),
which clears the ATM_VF_READY bit under the same lock. Otherwise, we
could end up submitting a packet to the device driver even after its
->ops->close method has been called. And it could call the vcc's ->pop
method after the protocol has been shut down. Which leads to a panic.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>
---
 net/atm/br2684.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/atm/br2684.c b/net/atm/br2684.c
index 8eb6fbe..5ff145f 100644
--- a/net/atm/br2684.c
+++ b/net/atm/br2684.c
@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ struct br2684_vcc {
 	/* keep old push, pop functions for chaining */
 	void (*old_push)(struct atm_vcc *vcc, struct sk_buff *skb);
 	void (*old_pop)(struct atm_vcc *vcc, struct sk_buff *skb);
+	void (*old_release_cb)(struct atm_vcc *vcc);
 	enum br2684_encaps encaps;
 	struct list_head brvccs;
 #ifdef CONFIG_ATM_BR2684_IPFILTER
@@ -269,6 +270,22 @@ static int br2684_xmit_vcc(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
 	return !atmvcc->send(atmvcc, skb);
 }
 
+static void br2684_release_cb(struct atm_vcc *atmvcc)
+{
+	struct br2684_vcc *brvcc = BR2684_VCC(atmvcc);
+
+	/*
+	 * A race with br2684_xmit_vcc() might cause a spurious wakeup just
+	 * after that function *stops* the queue, and qspace might actually
+	 * go negative before the queue stops again. We cope with that.
+	 */
+	if (atomic_read(&brvcc->qspace) > 0)
+		netif_wake_queue(brvcc->device);
+
+	if (brvcc->old_release_cb)
+		brvcc->old_release_cb(atmvcc);
+}
+
 static inline struct br2684_vcc *pick_outgoing_vcc(const struct sk_buff *skb,
 						   const struct br2684_dev *brdev)
 {
@@ -280,6 +297,8 @@ static netdev_tx_t br2684_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
 {
 	struct br2684_dev *brdev = BRPRIV(dev);
 	struct br2684_vcc *brvcc;
+	struct atm_vcc *atmvcc;
+	netdev_tx_t ret = NETDEV_TX_OK;
 
 	pr_debug("skb_dst(skb)=%p\n", skb_dst(skb));
 	read_lock(&devs_lock);
@@ -290,9 +309,26 @@ static netdev_tx_t br2684_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
 		dev->stats.tx_carrier_errors++;
 		/* netif_stop_queue(dev); */
 		dev_kfree_skb(skb);
-		read_unlock(&devs_lock);
-		return NETDEV_TX_OK;
+		goto out_devs;
+	}
+	atmvcc = brvcc->atmvcc;
+
+	bh_lock_sock(sk_atm(atmvcc));
+
+	if (test_bit(ATM_VF_RELEASED, &atmvcc->flags) ||
+	    test_bit(ATM_VF_CLOSE, &atmvcc->flags) ||
+	    !test_bit(ATM_VF_READY, &atmvcc->flags)) {
+		dev->stats.tx_dropped++;
+		dev_kfree_skb(skb);
+		goto out;
 	}
+
+	if (sock_owned_by_user(sk_atm(atmvcc))) {
+		netif_stop_queue(brvcc->device);
+		ret = NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
 	if (!br2684_xmit_vcc(skb, dev, brvcc)) {
 		/*
 		 * We should probably use netif_*_queue() here, but that
@@ -304,8 +340,11 @@ static netdev_tx_t br2684_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
 		dev->stats.tx_errors++;
 		dev->stats.tx_fifo_errors++;
 	}
+ out:
+	bh_unlock_sock(sk_atm(atmvcc));
+ out_devs:
 	read_unlock(&devs_lock);
-	return NETDEV_TX_OK;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -378,6 +417,7 @@ static void br2684_close_vcc(struct br2684_vcc *brvcc)
 	list_del(&brvcc->brvccs);
 	write_unlock_irq(&devs_lock);
 	brvcc->atmvcc->user_back = NULL;	/* what about vcc->recvq ??? */
+	brvcc->atmvcc->release_cb = brvcc->old_release_cb;
 	brvcc->old_push(brvcc->atmvcc, NULL);	/* pass on the bad news */
 	kfree(brvcc);
 	module_put(THIS_MODULE);
@@ -554,9 +594,11 @@ static int br2684_regvcc(struct atm_vcc *atmvcc, void __user * arg)
 	brvcc->encaps = (enum br2684_encaps)be.encaps;
 	brvcc->old_push = atmvcc->push;
 	brvcc->old_pop = atmvcc->pop;
+	brvcc->old_release_cb = atmvcc->release_cb;
 	barrier();
 	atmvcc->push = br2684_push;
 	atmvcc->pop = br2684_pop;
+	atmvcc->release_cb = br2684_release_cb;
 
 	/* initialize netdev carrier state */
 	if (atmvcc->dev->signal == ATM_PHY_SIG_LOST)
-- 
1.8.0





-- 
dwmw2


Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (6171 bytes)