[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1481496655.36482563.1354294066563.JavaMail.root@vmware.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 08:47:46 -0800 (PST)
From: Andy King <acking@...are.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: George Zhang <georgezhang@...are.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, pv-drivers@...are.com,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] VMCI: Some header and config files.
I didn't get the resend either, so it seems our corporate mail really is
eating messages. Lovely.
> > > +#define IOCTLCMD(_cmd) IOCTL_VMCI_ ## _cmd
> >
> > I don't recall ever getting a valid answer for this (if you did, my
> > appologies, can you repeat it). What in the world are you talking
> > about here? Why is your driver somehow special from the thousands
> > of other ones that use the in-kernel IO macros properly for an
> > ioctl?
Because we're morons. And unfortunately, we've shipped our product
using those broken definitions: our VMX uses them to talk to the driver.
So here's what we'd like to do. We will send out a patch soon that
fixes the other issues you mention and also adds IOCTL definitions the
proper way using _IOBLAH(). But we'd also like to retain these broken
definitions for a short period, commented as such, at least until we
can get out a patch release to Workstation 9, at which point we can
remove them. Does that sound reasonable?
Thanks!
- Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists