[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFziiaWt1nU-EPKc=tFd0EvSm2iSBJ2MAqxNiWP5O0mv+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 09:01:50 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mario Gzuk <mariogzuk@...hnikz.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] x86, cleanups: Simplify sync_core() in the case of no CPUID
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 1:24 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> Thinking about it some more, there is another reason to not do this,
> which is that we don't want this particular CPUID to be paravirtualized;
> we're after the synchronizing side effect, not the CPUID return value
> itself.
>
> So let's leave it as a primitive; it gets too confusing otherwise.
Hmm. The virtualization issue brings up another point: do we *really*
want to use cpuid for serialization at all?
Exactly because under _real_ virtualization (as opposed to para-virt),
it can cause unnecessary exits in a virtualized environment, no?
So I'm wondering if there is any better synchronizing instruction..
I guess sync_core() isn't used *that* much, so maybe we don't care,
but I thought I'd ask...
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists