[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121130173635.GD23034@liondog.tnic>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 18:36:35 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Lance Ortiz <lance.ortiz@...com>, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
lance_ortiz@...mail.com, jiang.liu@...wei.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
mchehab@...hat.com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] aerdrv: Trace Event for AER
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 08:53:51AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 14:42 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> > So, it sounds to me like we should we move all RAS-specific tracepoints
> > to <trace/events/ras.h> and then in each usage site do:
>
> Note, the CREATE_TRACE_POINTS must only be done in one location. Not
> every place. It creates the code that does the work to make the
> tracepoints show up in /debug/tracing/events/* as well as the callback
> code and other such things. If you define it in more than one .c file,
> then you will have linker issues due to the functions being created more
> than once.
>
> >
> > #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> > #include <trace/events/ras.h>
> >
> > Correct?
>
> That's the default way to do things.
Ok, cool.
Lance, care to move the TP to a new header called
include/trace/events/ras.h in your next iteration of the patches?
I'll later move the mc_event TP there too and drop the RAS-specific TP
header.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists