linux-kernel - [PATCH] x86, fpu: avoid FPU lazy restore after suspend

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1354301523-5252-2-git-send-email-vpalatin@chromium.org>
Date:	Fri, 30 Nov 2012 10:52:03 -0800
From:	Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@...omium.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...el.com>,
	Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@...omium.org>,
	Olof Johansson <olofj@...omium.org>,
	Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH] x86, fpu: avoid FPU lazy restore after suspend

When a cpu enters S3 state, the FPU state is lost.
After resuming for S3, if we try to lazy restore the FPU for a process running
on the same CPU, this will result in a corrupted FPU context.

We can just invalidate the "fpu_owner_task", so nobody will try to
lazy restore a state which no longer exists in the hardware.

Tested with a 64-bit kernel on a 4-core Ivybridge CPU with eagerfpu=off,
by doing thousands of suspend/resume cycles with 4 processes doing FPU
operations running. Without the patch, a process is killed after a
few hundreds cycles by a SIGFPE.

The issue seems to exist since 3.4 (after the FPU lazy restore was actually implemented),
to apply the change to 3.4, "this_cpu_write" needs to be replaced by percpu_write.

Cc: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@...omium.org>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olofj@...omium.org>
Cc: <stable@...nel.org> [v3.4+] # for 3.4 need to replace this_cpu_write by percpu_write
Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@...omium.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c |    5 +++++
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index c80a33b..7610c58 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -68,6 +68,8 @@
 #include <asm/mwait.h>
 #include <asm/apic.h>
 #include <asm/io_apic.h>
+#include <asm/i387.h>
+#include <asm/fpu-internal.h>
 #include <asm/setup.h>
 #include <asm/uv/uv.h>
 #include <linux/mc146818rtc.h>
@@ -1230,6 +1232,9 @@ int native_cpu_disable(void)
 	clear_local_APIC();
 
 	cpu_disable_common();
+
+	/* the FPU context will be lost, nobody owns it */
+	this_cpu_write(fpu_owner_task, NULL);
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
1.7.7.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/