linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] percpu-rwsem: use synchronize_sched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 30 Nov 2012 19:57:09 +0100
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@...il.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] percpu-rwsem: use synchronize_sched_expedited

On 11/29, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 22:59:52 -0500 (EST)
> Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > percpu-rwsem: use synchronize_sched_expedited
> >
> > Use synchronize_sched_expedited() instead of synchronize_sched()
> > to improve mount speed.
> >
> > This patch improves mount time from 0.500s to 0.013s.
> >
> > Note: if realtime people complain about the use
> > synchronize_sched_expedited() and synchronize_rcu_expedited(), I suggest
> > that they introduce an option CONFIG_REALTIME or
> > /proc/sys/kernel/realtime and turn off these *_expedited functions if
> > the option is enabled (i.e. turn synchronize_sched_expedited into
> > synchronize_sched and synchronize_rcu_expedited into synchronize_rcu).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
>
> So I read through this thread but I really didn't see a clear
> description of why mount() got slower.  The changelog for 4b05a1c74d1
> is spectacularly awful :(
>
>
> Apparently the slowdown occurred because a blockdev mount patch
> 62ac665ff9fc07497ca524 ("blockdev: turn a rw semaphore into a percpu rw
> semaphore") newly uses percpu rwsems, and percpu rwsems are slow on the
> down_write() path.
>
> And using synchronize_sched_expedited() rather than synchronize_sched()
> makes percpu_down_write() somewhat less slow.  Correct?
>
> Why is it OK to use synchronize_sched_expedited() here?  If it's
> faster, why can't we use synchronize_sched_expedited() everywhere and
> zap synchronize_sched()?

synchronize_sched_expedited() is much faster but it is heavyweight,
try_stop_cpus() affects the whole system.

We briefly discussed this possibility with Paul, personally I think it
would be better to add percpu_rw_semaphore->use_expedited or add the
percpu_down_write_expedited().

But this change was already applied. I hope we can do this later.

> Oleg, this has implications for your
> percpu_rw_semaphore-reimplement-to-not-block-the-readers-unnecessarily.patch.
> I've changed that to use synchronize_sched_expedited() everywhere -
> please have a think and a retest.

Thanks a lot Andrew. The fix looks obviously fine, but I'll try to test
anyway.

> Note that elsewhere in this thread,
> percpu_rw_semaphore-reimplement-to-not-block-the-readers-unnecessarily.patch
> was found to slow mount down again somewhat, because it adds an
> additional synchronize_sched[_expedited]() to the percpu_down_write()
> path.

Cough... this patch _removes_ one synchronize_sched[_expedited]() and
removes msleep ;) Although the main point was not-block-the-readers.

And I think we can remove another one, but this is not trivial and
percpu_free_rwsem() should be might_sleep().

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/