[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121130185755.GA26841@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 10:57:55 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...are.com>
Cc: pv-drivers@...are.com, Andy King <acking@...are.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [Pv-drivers] [PATCH 12/12] VMCI: Some header and config files.
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:45:44AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> However you snipped the rest of my reply: do we really need to renumber
> ioctls? There is no benefit for the driver as its ioctl handler does
> not parse the numbers into components.
I don't know if you need to renumber, I really don't understand what you
were trying to do with this code, and as it was acting differently from
all other kernel ioctl declarations, I asked for some clarity.
If you can rewrite it to look sane, and keep the same numbers, that's
fine with me.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists