| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 20:58:41 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 10/10] sched: Refine the 'shared tasks' memory interleaving logic
Change the adaptive memory policy code to take a majority of buddies
on a node into account. Previously, since this commit:
"sched: Track shared task's node groups and interleave their memory allocations"
We'd include any node that has run a buddy in the past, which was too
aggressive and spread the allocations of 'mostly converged' workloads
too much, and prevented their further convergence.
Add a few other variants for testing:
NUMA_POLICY_ADAPTIVE: use memory on every node that runs a buddy of this task
NUMA_POLICY_SYSWIDE: use a simple, static, system-wide mask
NUMA_POLICY_MAXNODE: use memory on this task's 'maximum node'
NUMA_POLICY_MAXBUDDIES: use memory on the node with the most buddies
NUMA_POLICY_MANYBUDDIES: this is the default, a quorum of buddies
determines the allocation mask
The 'many buddies' quorum logic appears to work best in practice,
but the 'maxnode' and 'syswide' ones are good, robust policies too.
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 2 +-
kernel/sched/fair.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
kernel/sched/features.h | 6 ++++++
kernel/sched/sched.h | 4 ++--
4 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 47b14d1..9fef0d3 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ void update_rq_clock(struct rq *rq)
#define SCHED_FEAT(name, enabled) \
(1UL << __SCHED_FEAT_##name) * enabled |
-const_debug unsigned int sysctl_sched_features =
+const_debug u64 sysctl_sched_features =
#include "features.h"
0;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 9262692..18d732f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1611,6 +1611,9 @@ static int sched_update_ideal_cpu_shared(struct task_struct *p, int *flip_tasks)
min_node_load = LONG_MAX;
min_node = -1;
+ if (sched_feat(NUMA_POLICY_MANYBUDDIES))
+ nodes_clear(p->numa_policy.v.nodes);
+
/*
* Map out our maximum buddies layout:
*/
@@ -1677,16 +1680,28 @@ static int sched_update_ideal_cpu_shared(struct task_struct *p, int *flip_tasks)
min_node = node;
}
- if (buddies)
- node_set(node, p->numa_policy.v.nodes);
- else
- node_clear(node, p->numa_policy.v.nodes);
+ if (sched_feat(NUMA_POLICY_ADAPTIVE)) {
+ if (buddies)
+ node_set(node, p->numa_policy.v.nodes);
+ else
+ node_clear(node, p->numa_policy.v.nodes);
+ }
+
+ if (!buddies) {
+ if (sched_feat(NUMA_POLICY_MANYBUDDIES))
+ node_clear(node, p->numa_policy.v.nodes);
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ /* A majority of buddies attracts memory: */
+ if (sched_feat(NUMA_POLICY_MANYBUDDIES)) {
+ if (buddies >= 3)
+ node_set(node, p->numa_policy.v.nodes);
+ }
/* Don't go to a node that is near its capacity limit: */
if (node_load + SCHED_LOAD_SCALE > node_capacity)
continue;
- if (!buddies)
- continue;
if (buddies > max_buddies && target_cpu != -1) {
max_buddies = buddies;
@@ -1696,6 +1711,13 @@ static int sched_update_ideal_cpu_shared(struct task_struct *p, int *flip_tasks)
}
}
+ /* Cluster memory around the buddies maximum: */
+ if (sched_feat(NUMA_POLICY_MAXBUDDIES)) {
+ if (ideal_node != -1) {
+ nodes_clear(p->numa_policy.v.nodes);
+ node_set(ideal_node, p->numa_policy.v.nodes);
+ }
+ }
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ideal_node == -1 && ideal_cpu != -1))
return this_cpu;
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ideal_node != -1 && ideal_cpu == -1))
@@ -2079,6 +2101,15 @@ static void task_numa_placement_tick(struct task_struct *p)
p->numa_faults[idx_oldnode] = 0;
}
sched_setnuma(p, ideal_node, shared);
+
+ /* Allocate only the maximum node: */
+ if (sched_feat(NUMA_POLICY_MAXNODE)) {
+ nodes_clear(p->numa_policy.v.nodes);
+ node_set(ideal_node, p->numa_policy.v.nodes);
+ }
+ /* Allocate system-wide: */
+ if (sched_feat(NUMA_POLICY_SYSWIDE))
+ p->numa_policy.v.nodes = node_online_map;
/*
* We changed a node, start scanning more frequently again
* to map out the working set:
diff --git a/kernel/sched/features.h b/kernel/sched/features.h
index 9075faf..1775b80 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/features.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/features.h
@@ -81,5 +81,11 @@ SCHED_FEAT(NUMA_LB, false)
SCHED_FEAT(NUMA_GROUP_LB_COMPRESS, true)
SCHED_FEAT(NUMA_GROUP_LB_SPREAD, true)
SCHED_FEAT(MIGRATE_FAULT_STATS, false)
+SCHED_FEAT(NUMA_POLICY_ADAPTIVE, false)
+SCHED_FEAT(NUMA_POLICY_SYSWIDE, false)
+SCHED_FEAT(NUMA_POLICY_MAXNODE, false)
+SCHED_FEAT(NUMA_POLICY_MAXBUDDIES, false)
+SCHED_FEAT(NUMA_POLICY_MANYBUDDIES, true)
+
SCHED_FEAT(NUMA_CONVERGE_MIGRATIONS, true)
#endif
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index ca92adf..ace1159 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -648,7 +648,7 @@ static inline void __set_task_cpu(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int cpu)
# define const_debug const
#endif
-extern const_debug unsigned int sysctl_sched_features;
+extern const_debug u64 sysctl_sched_features;
#define SCHED_FEAT(name, enabled) \
__SCHED_FEAT_##name ,
@@ -684,7 +684,7 @@ static __always_inline bool static_branch_##name(struct static_key *key) \
extern struct static_key sched_feat_keys[__SCHED_FEAT_NR];
#define sched_feat(x) (static_branch_##x(&sched_feat_keys[__SCHED_FEAT_##x]))
#else /* !(SCHED_DEBUG && HAVE_JUMP_LABEL) */
-#define sched_feat(x) (sysctl_sched_features & (1UL << __SCHED_FEAT_##x))
+#define sched_feat(x) (sysctl_sched_features & (1ULL << __SCHED_FEAT_##x))
#endif /* SCHED_DEBUG && HAVE_JUMP_LABEL */
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
--
1.7.11.7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists