[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP_ceTz-63+vpg3dMr8Xc2dek0SUWvV3nJAwQWj_GYP07Wcsgg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 13:45:42 -0800
From: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@...omium.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...el.com>,
Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@...omium.org>,
Olof Johansson <olofj@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, fpu: avoid FPU lazy restore after suspend
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:55 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/30/2012 11:54 AM, Vincent Palatin wrote:
> >>
> > I have done a patch v2 according to your suggestions.
> > I will run the testing on it now.
> > I probably need at least 2 to 3 hours to validate it.
> >
>
> That would be super. Let me know and I'll queue it up and send a pull
> request with this and a few more urgent things to Linus.
I have done 1000+ cycles so far with patch v3 (on 4-core Ivybridge and
no eagerfpu),
and did not hit my issue.
I let the testing going on,
but wrt the issue after suspend, this fixes it with very high probability
(ie I have never done that many cycles without hitting the issue).
--
Vincent
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists