linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v2 0/5] Add movablecore

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5a01986b-e412-44df-b376-fce7f8937b93@email.android.com>
Date:	Thu, 29 Nov 2012 19:28:12 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
CC:	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
	Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"rob@...dley.net" <rob@...dley.net>,
	"isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com" <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
	"laijs@...fujitsu.com" <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	"wency@...fujitsu.com" <wency@...fujitsu.com>,
	"linfeng@...fujitsu.com" <linfeng@...fujitsu.com>,
	"yinghai@...nel.org" <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	"kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	"minchan.kim@...il.com" <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
	"rientjes@...gle.com" <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	"rusty@...tcorp.com.au" <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	"Wang, Frank" <frank.wang@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 0/5] Add movablecore_map boot option

Disk I/O is still a big consumer of lowmem.

"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com> wrote:

>> If any significant percentage of memory is in ZONE_MOVABLE then the
>memory
>> hotplug people will have to deal with all the lowmem/highmem problems
>> that used to be faced by 32-bit x86 with PAE enabled. 
>
>While these problems may still exist on large systems - I think it
>becomes
>harder to construct workloads that run into problems.  In those bad old
>days
>a significant fraction of lowmem was consumed by the kernel ... so it
>was
>pretty easy to find meta-data intensive workloads that would push it
>over
>a cliff.  Here we  are talking about systems with say 128GB per node
>divided
>into 64GB moveable and 64GB non-moveable (and I'd regard this as a
>rather
>low-end machine).  Unless the workload consists of zillions of tiny
>processes
>all mapping shared memory blocks, the percentage of memory allocated to
>the kernel is going to be tiny compared with the old 4GB days.
>
>-Tony

-- 
Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/