[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1354246809-32339-2-git-send-email-filbranden@google.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 19:40:08 -0800
From: Filipe Brandenburger <filbranden@...gle.com>
To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...ionio.com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Filipe Brandenburger <filbranden@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Btrfs: fix permissions of empty files not affected by umask
When a new file is created with btrfs_create(), the inode will initially be
created with permissions 0666 and later on in btrfs_init_acl() it will be
adapted to mask out the umask bits. The problem is that this change won't make
it into the btrfs_inode unless there's another change to the inode (e.g. writing
content changing the size or touching the file changing the mtime.)
This fix adds a call to btrfs_update_inode() to btrfs_create() to make sure that
the change will not get lost if the in-memory inode is flushed before other
changes are made to the file.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Brandenburger <filbranden@...gle.com>
---
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 95542a1..caf9d76 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -4996,6 +4996,12 @@ static int btrfs_create(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
goto out_unlock;
}
+ err = btrfs_update_inode(trans, root, inode);
+ if (err) {
+ drop_inode = 1;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
+
/*
* If the active LSM wants to access the inode during
* d_instantiate it needs these. Smack checks to see
--
1.7.11.7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists