[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121130152604.251a14846d6f29c18d65ccae@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 15:26:04 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the tip tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the kvm tree got a conflict in
kernel/sched/core.c between commit 0a74bef8bed1 ("sched: Add an rq
migration call-back to sched_class") from the tip tree and commit
582b336ec2c0 ("sched: add notifier for cross-cpu migrations") from the
kvm tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc kernel/sched/core.c
index 20fb760,c86b8b6..0000000
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@@ -953,10 -959,16 +960,18 @@@ void set_task_cpu(struct task_struct *p
trace_sched_migrate_task(p, new_cpu);
if (task_cpu(p) != new_cpu) {
+ struct task_migration_notifier tmn;
+
+ if (p->sched_class->migrate_task_rq)
+ p->sched_class->migrate_task_rq(p, new_cpu);
p->se.nr_migrations++;
perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_CPU_MIGRATIONS, 1, NULL, 0);
+
+ tmn.task = p;
+ tmn.from_cpu = task_cpu(p);
+ tmn.to_cpu = new_cpu;
+
+ atomic_notifier_call_chain(&task_migration_notifier, 0, &tmn);
}
__set_task_cpu(p, new_cpu);
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists