[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121201143926.GB2685@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2012 06:39:26 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@....EDU>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Wireless regression in workqueue: use mod_delayed_work() instead
of __cancel + queue
Hey, Anders.
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:15:50PM -0500, Anders Kaseorg wrote:
> Yes. I tested that both directly on top of the bad commit, and on
> v3.7-rc7, and it fixes the bug in both cases.
Can you please test this one too? Thanks!
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 042d221..94964d1 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -1364,6 +1364,11 @@ static void __queue_delayed_work(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
BUG_ON(timer_pending(timer));
BUG_ON(!list_empty(&work->entry));
+ if (!delay) {
+ __queue_work(cpu, wq, &dwork->work);
+ return;
+ }
+
timer_stats_timer_set_start_info(&dwork->timer);
/*
@@ -1417,9 +1422,6 @@ bool queue_delayed_work_on(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
bool ret = false;
unsigned long flags;
- if (!delay)
- return queue_work_on(cpu, wq, &dwork->work);
-
/* read the comment in __queue_work() */
local_irq_save(flags);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists