| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1354473824-19229-42-git-send-email-mingo@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 19:43:33 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 41/52] sched: Move the NUMA placement logic to a worklet
As an implementational detail, to be able to do directed task placement
we have to change how task_numa_fault() interfaces with the scheduler:
instead of the placement logic being executed directly from the fault
path we now trigger a worklet, similarly to how we do the NUMA
hinting fault work.
This moves placement into process context and allows the execution of the
directed task-flipping code via sched_rebalance_to().
This further decouples the NUMA hinting fault engine from
the actual NUMA placement logic.
[ Also move __sched_fork() out of preemptible context. ]
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 3 +-
kernel/sched/core.c | 25 ++++++++-
kernel/sched/fair.c | 153 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
kernel/sched/sched.h | 5 ++
4 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 696492e..ce9ccd7 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1512,7 +1512,8 @@ struct task_struct {
unsigned long numa_weight;
unsigned long *numa_faults;
unsigned long *numa_faults_curr;
- struct callback_head numa_work;
+ struct callback_head numa_scan_work;
+ struct callback_head numa_placement_work;
struct task_struct *shared_buddy, *shared_buddy_curr;
unsigned long shared_buddy_faults, shared_buddy_faults_curr;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index cad6c89..05d4e1d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
#include <linux/kernel_stat.h>
#include <linux/debug_locks.h>
#include <linux/perf_event.h>
+#include <linux/task_work.h>
#include <linux/security.h>
#include <linux/notifier.h>
#include <linux/profile.h>
@@ -1558,7 +1559,6 @@ static void __sched_fork(struct task_struct *p)
p->numa_migrate_seq = 2;
p->numa_faults = NULL;
p->numa_scan_period = sysctl_sched_numa_scan_delay;
- p->numa_work.next = &p->numa_work;
p->shared_buddy = NULL;
p->shared_buddy_faults = 0;
@@ -1570,6 +1570,25 @@ static void __sched_fork(struct task_struct *p)
p->numa_policy.v.preferred_node = 0;
p->numa_policy.v.nodes = node_online_map;
+ init_task_work(&p->numa_scan_work, task_numa_scan_work);
+ p->numa_scan_work.next = &p->numa_scan_work;
+
+ init_task_work(&p->numa_placement_work, task_numa_placement_work);
+ p->numa_placement_work.next = &p->numa_placement_work;
+
+ if (p->mm) {
+ int entries = 2*nr_node_ids;
+ int size = sizeof(*p->numa_faults) * entries;
+
+ /*
+ * For efficiency reasons we allocate ->numa_faults[]
+ * and ->numa_faults_curr[] at once and split the
+ * buffer we get. They are separate otherwise.
+ */
+ p->numa_faults = kzalloc(2*size, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (p->numa_faults)
+ p->numa_faults_curr = p->numa_faults + entries;
+ }
#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING */
}
@@ -1579,9 +1598,11 @@ static void __sched_fork(struct task_struct *p)
void sched_fork(struct task_struct *p)
{
unsigned long flags;
- int cpu = get_cpu();
+ int cpu;
__sched_fork(p);
+
+ cpu = get_cpu();
/*
* We mark the process as running here. This guarantees that
* nobody will actually run it, and a signal or other external
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index f0d3876..fda1b63 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1063,19 +1063,18 @@ clear_buddy:
p->ideal_cpu_curr = -1;
}
-static void task_numa_placement(struct task_struct *p)
+/*
+ * Called every couple of hundred milliseconds in the task's
+ * execution life-time, this function decides whether to
+ * change placement parameters:
+ */
+static void task_numa_placement_tick(struct task_struct *p)
{
- int seq = ACCESS_ONCE(p->mm->numa_scan_seq);
unsigned long total[2] = { 0, 0 };
unsigned long faults, max_faults = 0;
int node, priv, shared, max_node = -1;
int this_node;
- if (p->numa_scan_seq == seq)
- return;
-
- p->numa_scan_seq = seq;
-
/*
* Update the fault average with the result of the latest
* scan:
@@ -1279,44 +1278,25 @@ void task_numa_fault(int node, int last_cpu, int pages)
int priv = (task_cpu(p) == last_cpu);
int idx = 2*node + priv;
- WARN_ON_ONCE(last_cpu < 0 || node < 0);
-
- if (unlikely(!p->numa_faults)) {
- int entries = 2*nr_node_ids;
- int size = sizeof(*p->numa_faults) * entries;
-
- p->numa_faults = kzalloc(2*size, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!p->numa_faults)
- return;
- /*
- * For efficiency reasons we allocate ->numa_faults[]
- * and ->numa_faults_curr[] at once and split the
- * buffer we get. They are separate otherwise.
- */
- p->numa_faults_curr = p->numa_faults + entries;
- }
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(last_cpu == -1 || node == -1);
+ BUG_ON(!p->numa_faults);
p->numa_faults_curr[idx] += pages;
shared_fault_tick(p, node, last_cpu, pages);
- task_numa_placement(p);
}
/*
* The expensive part of numa migration is done from task_work context.
* Triggered from task_tick_numa().
*/
-void task_numa_work(struct callback_head *work)
+void task_numa_placement_work(struct callback_head *work)
{
- long pages_total, pages_left, pages_changed;
- unsigned long migrate, next_scan, now = jiffies;
- unsigned long start0, start, end;
struct task_struct *p = current;
- struct mm_struct *mm = p->mm;
- struct vm_area_struct *vma;
- WARN_ON_ONCE(p != container_of(work, struct task_struct, numa_work));
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(p != container_of(work, struct task_struct, numa_placement_work));
work->next = work; /* protect against double add */
+
/*
* Who cares about NUMA placement when they're dying.
*
@@ -1328,6 +1308,29 @@ void task_numa_work(struct callback_head *work)
if (p->flags & PF_EXITING)
return;
+ task_numa_placement_tick(p);
+}
+
+/*
+ * The expensive part of numa migration is done from task_work context.
+ * Triggered from task_tick_numa().
+ */
+void task_numa_scan_work(struct callback_head *work)
+{
+ long pages_total, pages_left, pages_changed;
+ unsigned long migrate, next_scan, now = jiffies;
+ unsigned long start0, start, end;
+ struct task_struct *p = current;
+ struct mm_struct *mm = p->mm;
+ struct vm_area_struct *vma;
+
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(p != container_of(work, struct task_struct, numa_scan_work));
+
+ work->next = work; /* protect against double add */
+
+ if (p->flags & PF_EXITING)
+ return;
+
/*
* Enforce maximal scan/migration frequency..
*/
@@ -1383,15 +1386,12 @@ out:
/*
* Drive the periodic memory faults..
*/
-void task_tick_numa(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr)
+static void task_tick_numa_scan(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr)
{
- struct callback_head *work = &curr->numa_work;
+ struct callback_head *work = &curr->numa_scan_work;
u64 period, now;
- /*
- * We don't care about NUMA placement if we don't have memory.
- */
- if (!curr->mm || (curr->flags & PF_EXITING) || work->next != work)
+ if (work->next != work)
return;
/*
@@ -1403,28 +1403,67 @@ void task_tick_numa(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr)
now = curr->se.sum_exec_runtime;
period = (u64)curr->numa_scan_period * NSEC_PER_MSEC;
- if (now - curr->node_stamp > period) {
- curr->node_stamp += period;
- curr->numa_scan_period = sysctl_sched_numa_scan_period_min;
+ if (now - curr->node_stamp <= period)
+ return;
- /*
- * We are comparing runtime to wall clock time here, which
- * puts a maximum scan frequency limit on the task work.
- *
- * This, together with the limits in task_numa_work() filters
- * us from over-sampling if there are many threads: if all
- * threads happen to come in at the same time we don't create a
- * spike in overhead.
- *
- * We also avoid multiple threads scanning at once in parallel to
- * each other.
- */
- if (!time_before(jiffies, curr->mm->numa_next_scan)) {
- init_task_work(work, task_numa_work); /* TODO: move this into sched_fork() */
- task_work_add(curr, work, true);
- }
- }
+ curr->node_stamp += period;
+ curr->numa_scan_period = sysctl_sched_numa_scan_period_min;
+
+ /*
+ * We are comparing runtime to wall clock time here, which
+ * puts a maximum scan frequency limit on the task work.
+ *
+ * This, together with the limits in task_numa_work() filters
+ * us from over-sampling if there are many threads: if all
+ * threads happen to come in at the same time we don't create a
+ * spike in overhead.
+ *
+ * We also avoid multiple threads scanning at once in parallel to
+ * each other.
+ */
+ if (time_before(jiffies, curr->mm->numa_next_scan))
+ return;
+
+ task_work_add(curr, work, true);
}
+
+/*
+ * Drive the placement logic:
+ */
+static void task_tick_numa_placement(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr)
+{
+ struct callback_head *work = &curr->numa_placement_work;
+ int seq;
+
+ if (work->next != work)
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * Check whether we should run task_numa_placement(),
+ * and if yes, activate the worklet:
+ */
+ seq = ACCESS_ONCE(curr->mm->numa_scan_seq);
+
+ if (curr->numa_scan_seq == seq)
+ return;
+
+ curr->numa_scan_seq = seq;
+ task_work_add(curr, work, true);
+}
+
+static void task_tick_numa(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr)
+{
+ /*
+ * We don't care about NUMA placement if we don't have memory
+ * or are exiting:
+ */
+ if (!curr->mm || (curr->flags & PF_EXITING))
+ return;
+
+ task_tick_numa_scan(rq, curr);
+ task_tick_numa_placement(rq, curr);
+}
+
#else /* !CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING: */
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
static inline int task_ideal_cpu(struct task_struct *p) { return -1; }
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index c4d15fd..f46405e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1261,6 +1261,11 @@ static inline u64 irq_time_read(int cpu)
#endif /* CONFIG_64BIT */
#endif /* CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING */
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
+extern void task_numa_scan_work(struct callback_head *work);
+extern void task_numa_placement_work(struct callback_head *work);
+#endif
+
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
extern void sched_rebalance_to(int dest_cpu, int flip_tasks);
#else
--
1.7.11.7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists