[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFTL4hzqqQPA1cd4uPoCd73d5rBj8cGpv=VnB6CrCpdjjwr1xw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 00:59:07 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Request for tree inclusion
2012/12/2 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>:
> Well, these are a bit late (I expected Linus to release v3.7 today), but
> since Ingo has not piped in over the weekend, I have added them from today
> after the tip tree merge.
Yeah sorry to submit that so late. Those branches are in pending pull
requests to the -tip tree and I thought about relying on the
propagation of -tip into -next as usual. But Ingo has been very busy
with numa related work during this cycle. So until these branches get
merged in -tip, I'm short-circuiting a bit the -next step before it
becomes too late for the next merge window.
>
> I have called them fw-cputime, fs-sched and fw-nohz respectively and
> listed you as the only contact in case of problems.
Ok.
> If these are to be
> long term trees included in linux-next, I would prefer that you use
> better branch names - otherwise, if they are just short term, please tell
> me to remove them when they are finished with.
They are definitely short term. I'll tell you once these can be dropped.
Thanks a lot!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists