[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121202163449.GA20796@udknight>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 00:34:50 +0800
From: Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>
To: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
Cc: nic_swsd@...ltek.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3]realtek:r8169: Bugfix or workaround for missing
extended GigaMAC registers settings
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 12:44:01PM +0100, Francois Romieu wrote:
> Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com> :
> > + /*
> > + *This is a fix for BIOS forget to set
> > + *extend GigaMAC registers
> > + *Wang YanQing 12/1/2012
> > + */
>
> This part will go into the changelog.
I think brevity comment in code is good for
code's readableness. We read out the MAC{0,4},
and write them back in next line to call rtl_rar_set,
it don't have obvious sense for new readers, so I think
the brevity comment is good. Could you consider remaining
the comment except the no sense line "Wang YanQing 12/1/2012"?
>
> > + if (tp->mac_version == RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_34) {
> > + rtl_rar_set(tp, dev->dev_addr);
> > + }
>
> rtl_rar_set already includes a RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_34 test and non-8168evl
> devices are already able to stand an extra MAC{0, 4} write. I'll check
> it does not hurt on different 81xx devices and submit an update.
I add the test code to ignore the an extra MAC{0,4} write for non-8168evl
devices, and if you think it is not a issue, then I agree with you to remove
the test code.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists