[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50BC7118.9060407@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 17:30:00 +0800
From: Mark Zhang <nvmarkzhang@...il.com>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
CC: Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@...dia.com>,
"thierry.reding@...onic-design.de" <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arto Merilainen <amerilainen@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 8/8] drm: tegra: Add gr2d device
Hi Dave:
I'm new in kernel development. Could you tell me or give me some
materials to read that why we need to align the size of IOCTL structures
to 64bit? I can understand if we're working in a 64bit kernel but why we
need to do this if we're in a 32bit arm kernel? Besides, why the
pointers in IOCTL structure should be declared as u64?
Mark
On 11/27/2012 06:15 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> static int tegra_drm_open(struct drm_device *drm, struct drm_file *filp)
>> {
>> - return 0;
>> + struct tegra_drm_fpriv *fpriv;
>> + int err = 0;
>> +
>> + fpriv = kzalloc(sizeof(*fpriv), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!fpriv)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fpriv->contexts);
>> + filp->driver_priv = fpriv;
>> +
>
> who frees this?
>> +struct tegra_drm_syncpt_incr_args {
>> + __u32 id;
>> +};
>
> add 32-bits of padding here
>
>> +
>> +struct tegra_drm_syncpt_wait_args {
>> + __u32 id;
>> + __u32 thresh;
>> + __s32 timeout;
>> + __u32 value;
>> +};
>> +
>> +#define DRM_TEGRA_NO_TIMEOUT (-1)
>> +
>> +struct tegra_drm_open_channel_args {
>> + __u32 class;
>> + void *context;
>
> no pointers use u64, align them to 64-bits, so 32-bits of padding,
>
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct tegra_drm_get_channel_param_args {
>> + void *context;
>> + __u32 value;
>
> Same padding + uint64_t for void *
>
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct tegra_drm_syncpt_incr {
>> + __u32 syncpt_id;
>> + __u32 syncpt_incrs;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct tegra_drm_cmdbuf {
>> + __u32 mem;
>> + __u32 offset;
>> + __u32 words;
>> +};
>
> add padding
>> +
>> +struct tegra_drm_reloc {
>> + __u32 cmdbuf_mem;
>> + __u32 cmdbuf_offset;
>> + __u32 target;
>> + __u32 target_offset;
>> + __u32 shift;
>> +};
>
> add padding
>
>> +
>> +struct tegra_drm_waitchk {
>> + __u32 mem;
>> + __u32 offset;
>> + __u32 syncpt_id;
>> + __u32 thresh;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct tegra_drm_submit_args {
>> + void *context;
>> + __u32 num_syncpt_incrs;
>> + __u32 num_cmdbufs;
>> + __u32 num_relocs;
>> + __u32 submit_version;
>> + __u32 num_waitchks;
>> + __u32 waitchk_mask;
>> + __u32 timeout;
>> + struct tegra_drm_syncpt_incrs *syncpt_incrs;
>> + struct tegra_drm_cmdbuf *cmdbufs;
>> + struct tegra_drm_reloc *relocs;
>> + struct tegra_drm_waitchk *waitchks;
>> +
>> + __u32 pad[5]; /* future expansion */
>> + __u32 fence; /* Return value */
>> +};
>
> lose all the pointers for 64-bit aligned uint64_t.
>
> Probably should align all of these on __u64 and __u32 usage if possible.
>
> i'll look at the rest of the patches, but I need to know what commands
> can be submitted via this interface and what are the security
> implications of it.
>
> Dave.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists