[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1354540961.24281.82.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 13:22:41 +0000
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Krzysztof Mazur <krzysiek@...lesie.net>
Cc: chas williams - CONTRACTOR <chas@....nrl.navy.mil>,
davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] atm: introduce vcc_pop_skb()
On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 23:33 +0100, Krzysztof Mazur wrote:
>
> Many ATM drivers store vcc in ATM_SKB(skb)->vcc and use it for
> freeing skbs. Now they can just use atm_pop_skb() to free such
> buffers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Mazur <krzysiek@...lesie.net>
Note that this one didn't make it into the tree that Dave just pulled.
Not that I didn't think it was a good idea, but it was just separate
from the other "real" fixes — and the tree had already grown into a big
enough pile from your original single patch!
In <20121006154606.GA25588@...ek.podlesie.net> you posted another patch:
> I think there is another problem here. The pppoatm gets a reference
> to atmvcc, but I don't see anything that protects against removal
> of that vcc.
>
> The vcc uses vcc->sk socket for reference counting, so sock_hold()
> and sock_put() should be used by pppoatm.
That one I think *isn't* needed, because we have properly fixed the
races with vcc_destroy_socket(). I just wanted to check you agree...?
--
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@...el.com Intel Corporation
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (6171 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists