linux-kernel - [ 58/89] xfs: drop buffer io reference when a bad bio is built

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20121203143155.590807438@decadent.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:32:44 +0000
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
	Mark Tinguely <tinguely@....com>, Ben Myers <bpm@....com>
Subject: [ 58/89] xfs: drop buffer io reference when a bad bio is built

3.2-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>

commit d69043c42d8c6414fa28ad18d99973aa6c1c2e24 upstream.

Error handling in xfs_buf_ioapply_map() does not handle IO reference
counts correctly. We increment the b_io_remaining count before
building the bio, but then fail to decrement it in the failure case.
This leads to the buffer never running IO completion and releasing
the reference that the IO holds, so at unmount we can leak the
buffer. This leak is captured by this assert failure during unmount:

XFS: Assertion failed: atomic_read(&pag->pag_ref) == 0, file: fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c, line: 273

This is not a new bug - the b_io_remaining accounting has had this
problem for a long, long time - it's just very hard to get a
zero length bio being built by this code...

Further, the buffer IO error can be overwritten on a multi-segment
buffer by subsequent bio completions for partial sections of the
buffer. Hence we should only set the buffer error status if the
buffer is not already carrying an error status. This ensures that a
partial IO error on a multi-segment buffer will not be lost. This
part of the problem is a regression, however.

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@....com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@....com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c |   14 ++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
index 933b793..4b0b8dd 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
@@ -1197,9 +1197,14 @@ xfs_buf_bio_end_io(
 {
 	xfs_buf_t		*bp = (xfs_buf_t *)bio->bi_private;

-	xfs_buf_ioerror(bp, -error);
+	/*
+	 * don't overwrite existing errors - otherwise we can lose errors on
+	 * buffers that require multiple bios to complete.
+	 */
+	if (!bp->b_error)
+		xfs_buf_ioerror(bp, -error);

-	if (!error && xfs_buf_is_vmapped(bp) && (bp->b_flags & XBF_READ))
+	if (!bp->b_error && xfs_buf_is_vmapped(bp) && (bp->b_flags & XBF_READ))
 		invalidate_kernel_vmap_range(bp->b_addr, xfs_buf_vmap_len(bp));

 	_xfs_buf_ioend(bp, 1);
@@ -1279,6 +1284,11 @@ next_chunk:
 		if (size)
 			goto next_chunk;
 	} else {
+		/*
+		 * This is guaranteed not to be the last io reference count
+		 * because the caller (xfs_buf_iorequest) holds a count itself.
+		 */
+		atomic_dec(&bp->b_io_remaining);
 		xfs_buf_ioerror(bp, EIO);
 		bio_put(bio);
 	}

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/