[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121203.134132.558381056546064453.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 13:41:32 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: mst@...hat.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, jasowang@...hat.com, nhorman@...driver.com,
ramirose@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tun: only queue packets on device
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 15:19:43 +0200
> Historically tun supported two modes of operation:
> - in default mode, a small number of packets would get queued
> at the device, the rest would be queued in qdisc
> - in one queue mode, all packets would get queued at the device
>
> This might have made sense up to a point where we made the
> queue depth for both modes the same and set it to
> a huge value (500) so unless the consumer
> is stuck the chance of losing packets is small.
>
> Thus in practice both modes behave the same, but the
> default mode has some problems:
> - if packets are never consumed, fragments are never orphaned
> which cases a DOS for sender using zero copy transmit
> - overrun errors are hard to diagnose: fifo error is incremented
> only once so you can not distinguish between
> userspace that is stuck and a transient failure,
> tcpdump on the device does not show any traffic
>
> Userspace solves this simply by enabling IFF_ONE_QUEUE
> but there seems to be little point in not doing the
> right thing for everyone, by default.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
Now that TUN_NO_QUEUE has no real effect and is a NOP, please document
it as such both in if_tun.h and the places in the driver that flip the
bit based upon userspace requests.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists