lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 14:01:04 -0500 From: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@...hat.com> To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] device_cgroup: make may_access() stronger On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 09:44:14AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote: > I kinda dislike this. This isn't a performanc critical path where we > must try our best to shave off a few condition checks. There's no > reason to encode the test like this. Please just spell the conditions > out in code rather than trying to build a magic series of equality > tests which somehow ends up spewing out the correct results. sure, will do. but this is not "magic", that's just logic simplification. -- Aristeu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists