[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121203151715.8c536a7a.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 15:17:15 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Chris Clayton <chris2553@...glemail.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>, Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@...wei.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v2 4/5] mm: provide more accurate estimation of
pages occupied by memmap
On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 19:55:09 +0000
Chris Clayton <chris2553@...glemail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 11/29/12 10:52, Chris Clayton wrote:
> > On 11/28/12 23:52, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 23:09:46 +0800
> >> Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v2 4/5] mm: provide more accurate estimation
> >>> of pages occupied by memmap
> >>
> >> How are people to test this? "does it boot"?
> >>
> >
> > I've been running kernels with Gerry's 5 patches applied for 11 days
> > now. This is on a 64bit laptop but with a 32bit kernel + HIGHMEM. I
> > joined the conversation because my laptop would not resume from suspend
> > to disk - it either froze or rebooted. With the patches applied the
> > laptop does successfully resume and has been stable.
> >
> > Since Monday, I have have been running a kernel with the patches (plus,
> > from today, the patch you mailed yesterday) applied to 3.7rc7, without
> > problems.
> >
>
> I've been running 3.7-rc7 with the patches listed below for a week now
> and it has been perfectly stable. In particular, my laptop will now
> successfully resume from suspend to disk, which always failed without
> the patches.
>
> From Jiang Liu:
> 1. [RFT PATCH v2 1/5] mm: introduce new field "managed_pages" to struct zone
> 2. [RFT PATCH v1 2/5] mm: replace zone->present_pages with
> zone->managed_pages if appreciated
> 3. [RFT PATCH v1 3/5] mm: set zone->present_pages to number of existing
> pages in the zone
> 4. [RFT PATCH v2 4/5] mm: provide more accurate estimation of pages
> occupied by memmap
> 5. [RFT PATCH v1 5/5] mm: increase totalram_pages when free pages
> allocated by bootmem allocator
>
> From Andrew Morton:
> 6. mm-provide-more-accurate-estimation-of-pages-occupied-by-memmap.patch
>
> Tested-by: Chris Clayton <chris2553@...glemail.com>
Thanks.
I have only two of these five patches queued for 3.8:
mm-introduce-new-field-managed_pages-to-struct-zone.patch and
mm-provide-more-accurate-estimation-of-pages-occupied-by-memmap.patch.
I don't recall what happened with the other three.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists