linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the devicetree tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20121203165717.c0a658649d824c9f5d5a2db3@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Mon, 3 Dec 2012 16:57:17 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the devicetree
 tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-vexpress/v2m.c between commit 465aac6d496a ("Fix build when
CONFIG_W1_MASTER_GPIO=m b exporting "allnodes"") from the devicetree tree
and commit 0891642cf117 ("ARM: vexpress: Start using new Versatile
Express infrastructure") from the arm-soc tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-vexpress/v2m.c
index 359f782,4e168e8..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/v2m.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/v2m.c
@@@ -580,20 -420,13 +420,13 @@@ void __init v2m_dt_map_io(void
  
  void __init v2m_dt_init_early(void)
  {
- 	struct device_node *node;
  	u32 dt_hbi;
  
- 	node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "arm,vexpress-sysreg");
- 	v2m_sysreg_base = of_iomap(node, 0);
- 	if (WARN_ON(!v2m_sysreg_base))
- 		return;
+ 	vexpress_sysreg_of_early_init();
  
  	/* Confirm board type against DT property, if available */
 -	if (of_property_read_u32(allnodes, "arm,hbi", &dt_hbi) == 0) {
 +	if (of_property_read_u32(of_allnodes, "arm,hbi", &dt_hbi) == 0) {
- 		int site = v2m_get_master_site();
- 		u32 id = readl(v2m_sysreg_base + (site == SYS_CFG_SITE_DB2 ?
- 				V2M_SYS_PROCID1 : V2M_SYS_PROCID0));
- 		u32 hbi = id & SYS_PROCIDx_HBI_MASK;
+ 		u32 hbi = vexpress_get_hbi(VEXPRESS_SITE_MASTER);
  
  		if (WARN_ON(dt_hbi != hbi))
  			pr_warning("vexpress: DT HBI (%x) is not matching "

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped