[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <33871315.gHWf0QtYzd@jason-thinkpad-t430s>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:22:46 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, krkumar2@...ibm.com,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
bhutchings@...arflare.com, jwhan@...ewood.snu.ac.kr,
shiyer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next rfc v7 1/3] virtio-net: separate fields of sending/receiving queue from virtnet_info
On Monday, December 03, 2012 01:18:48 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 01:15:01PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > +
> > > >
> > > > + /* Work struct for refilling if we run low on memory. */
> > > >
> > > > + struct delayed_work refill;
> > >
> > > I can't really see the justificaiton for a refill per queue. Just have
> > >
> > > one work iterate all the queues if it happens, unless it happens often
> > >
> > > (in which case, we need to look harder at this anyway).
> >
> > But during this kind of iteration, we may need enable/disable the napi
> > regardless of whether the receive queue has lots to be refilled. This may
> > add extra latency.
>
> We are running from the timer, so latency is not a concern I think.
Maybe, anyway it's only called when avaiable memory is low, so it should not
be an issue.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists