[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50BDC2CB.2030802@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:30:51 +0800
From: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
To: Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
CC: x86@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, cmetcalf@...era.com,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v4 05/12] memory-hotplug: introduce new function arch_remove_memory()
for removing page table depends on architecture
On 11/27/2012 06:00 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> For removing memory, we need to remove page table. But it depends
> on architecture. So the patch introduce arch_remove_memory() for
> removing page table. Now it only calls __remove_pages().
>
> Note: __remove_pages() for some archtecuture is not implemented
> (I don't know how to implement it for s390).
>
> CC: David Rientjes<rientjes@...gle.com>
> CC: Jiang Liu<liuj97@...il.com>
> CC: Len Brown<len.brown@...el.com>
> CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt<benh@...nel.crashing.org>
> CC: Paul Mackerras<paulus@...ba.org>
> CC: Christoph Lameter<cl@...ux.com>
> Cc: Minchan Kim<minchan.kim@...il.com>
> CC: Andrew Morton<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> CC: KOSAKI Motohiro<kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
> CC: Yasuaki Ishimatsu<isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang<wency@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> arch/ia64/mm/init.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> arch/s390/mm/init.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> arch/sh/mm/init.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> arch/tile/mm/init.c | 8 ++++++++
> arch/x86/mm/init_32.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> arch/x86/mm/init_64.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> include/linux/memory_hotplug.h | 1 +
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 2 ++
> 9 files changed, 97 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/ia64/mm/init.c b/arch/ia64/mm/init.c
> index 082e383..e333822 100644
> --- a/arch/ia64/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/ia64/mm/init.c
> @@ -689,6 +689,24 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
>
> return ret;
> }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> +int arch_remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
> +{
> + unsigned long start_pfn = start>> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + unsigned long nr_pages = size>> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + struct zone *zone;
> + int ret;
> +
> + zone = page_zone(pfn_to_page(start_pfn));
> + ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
> + if (ret)
> + pr_warn("%s: Problem encountered in __remove_pages() as"
> + " ret=%d\n", __func__, ret);
> +
> + return ret;
Just a little question, why do we have different handlers for ret on
different platforms ? Sometimes we print a msg, sometimes we just
return, and sometimes we give a WARN_ON(). But no big deal. :)
Reviewed-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
> +}
> +#endif
> #endif
>
> /*
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
> index 0dba506..09c6451 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
> @@ -133,6 +133,18 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
>
> return __add_pages(nid, zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
> }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> +int arch_remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
> +{
> + unsigned long start_pfn = start>> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + unsigned long nr_pages = size>> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + struct zone *zone;
> +
> + zone = page_zone(pfn_to_page(start_pfn));
> + return __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
> +}
> +#endif
> #endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG */
>
> /*
> diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/init.c b/arch/s390/mm/init.c
> index 81e596c..b565190 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/mm/init.c
> @@ -257,4 +257,16 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
> vmem_remove_mapping(start, size);
> return rc;
> }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> +int arch_remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
> +{
> + /*
> + * There is no hardware or firmware interface which could trigger a
> + * hot memory remove on s390. So there is nothing that needs to be
> + * implemented.
> + */
> + return -EBUSY;
> +}
> +#endif
> #endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG */
> diff --git a/arch/sh/mm/init.c b/arch/sh/mm/init.c
> index 82cc576..1057940 100644
> --- a/arch/sh/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/sh/mm/init.c
> @@ -558,4 +558,21 @@ int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 addr)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(memory_add_physaddr_to_nid);
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> +int arch_remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
> +{
> + unsigned long start_pfn = start>> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + unsigned long nr_pages = size>> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + struct zone *zone;
> + int ret;
> +
> + zone = page_zone(pfn_to_page(start_pfn));
> + ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
> + if (unlikely(ret))
> + pr_warn("%s: Failed, __remove_pages() == %d\n", __func__,
> + ret);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +#endif
> #endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG */
> diff --git a/arch/tile/mm/init.c b/arch/tile/mm/init.c
> index ef29d6c..2749515 100644
> --- a/arch/tile/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/tile/mm/init.c
> @@ -935,6 +935,14 @@ int remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
> {
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> +int arch_remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
> +{
> + /* TODO */
> + return -EBUSY;
> +}
> +#endif
> #endif
>
> struct kmem_cache *pgd_cache;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
> index 11a5800..b19eba4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
> @@ -839,6 +839,18 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
>
> return __add_pages(nid, zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
> }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> +int arch_remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
> +{
> + unsigned long start_pfn = start>> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + unsigned long nr_pages = size>> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + struct zone *zone;
> +
> + zone = page_zone(pfn_to_page(start_pfn));
> + return __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
> +}
> +#endif
> #endif
>
> /*
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> index 3baff25..5675335 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> @@ -680,6 +680,21 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arch_add_memory);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> +int __ref arch_remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
> +{
> + unsigned long start_pfn = start>> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + unsigned long nr_pages = size>> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + struct zone *zone;
> + int ret;
> +
> + zone = page_zone(pfn_to_page(start_pfn));
> + ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(ret);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +#endif
> #endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG */
>
> static struct kcore_list kcore_vsyscall;
> diff --git a/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h b/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
> index 38675e9..191b2d9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
> @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ extern void __online_page_free(struct page *page);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> extern bool is_pageblock_removable_nolock(struct page *page);
> +extern int arch_remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size);
> #endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE */
>
> /* reasonably generic interface to expand the physical pages in a zone */
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index 63d5388..e741732 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -1111,6 +1111,8 @@ repeat:
> /* remove memmap entry */
> firmware_map_remove(start, start + size, "System RAM");
>
> + arch_remove_memory(start, size);
> +
> unlock_memory_hotplug();
>
> return 0;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists